Comments on: Signature Based AntiVirus Technologies vs Malware Detection with a Coin Toss http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/signature-based-antivirus-and-hips-technologies-poor-endpoint-protection Secure Communications Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:36:13 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Malware http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/signature-based-antivirus-and-hips-technologies-poor-endpoint-protection/comment-page-1#comment-115 Malware Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:27:52 +0000 http://www.securitynowblog.com/?p=16#comment-115 I may be crazy, but I think that anything under AT LEAST 98% detections is just completely unacceptable. I mean, any lower and it is just a matter of time. I think this all hinges on which company keeps their definitions up tp date best AND is best at getting those defs out to the customers. Many companies are good at one or the other, few are good at both. I may be crazy, but I think that anything under AT LEAST 98% detections is just completely unacceptable. I mean, any lower and it is just a matter of time. I think this all hinges on which company keeps their definitions up tp date best AND is best at getting those defs out to the customers. Many companies are good at one or the other, few are good at both.

]]>