<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a PC Using a Limited User Account (LUA) Safe from Drive-by Download Attacks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/limited-user-account-does-not-protect-from-drive-by-download-attack/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/limited-user-account-does-not-protect-from-drive-by-download-attack</link>
	<description>Secure Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:24:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zack Wixom</title>
		<link>http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/limited-user-account-does-not-protect-from-drive-by-download-attack/comment-page-1#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Wixom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/?p=131#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>Awesome post.  I&#039;ve got to express though that for operating systems, I&#039;m still old school and usually stick with models that have had the kinks worked out for a couple years, how about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post.  I&#8217;ve got to express though that for operating systems, I&#8217;m still old school and usually stick with models that have had the kinks worked out for a couple years, how about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Software Cannot Be Trusted</title>
		<link>http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/limited-user-account-does-not-protect-from-drive-by-download-attack/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Software Cannot Be Trusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueridgenetworks.com/securitynowblog/?p=131#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] So, what can these malicious executables do from user-space? They can steal information, alter registry settings so they automatically run when Windows launches, and they can attack other applications or other computers. BTW, the Conficker worm attempts to crack the admin credentials for its host so it can implant something deeper and more invisible into its host. There are other vectors.  {More on this point in a post on Limited user accounts versus drive-by download attacks} [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, what can these malicious executables do from user-space? They can steal information, alter registry settings so they automatically run when Windows launches, and they can attack other applications or other computers. BTW, the Conficker worm attempts to crack the admin credentials for its host so it can implant something deeper and more invisible into its host. There are other vectors.  {More on this point in a post on Limited user accounts versus drive-by download attacks} [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
